Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 08:57:34 +0900
-------------------------------------------------
Linux Magazineの Metadata Benchmark紹介記事です:
"Harping on Metadata Performance: New Benchmarks"
April 6th, 2010, Jeffrey B. Layton
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7742/1.html
今回は US NCARで開発された metaratesを使用しています
metarates, Developed by HSS, October 2004
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/css/software/metarates/
High-End Services Section (HSS), NCAR
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/hss/index.shtml
ただし、metaratesは MPIアプリケーションです。
----------------------------------------
It is a MPI application that tests metadata performance by using POSIX system calls:
* creat() - (open and possibly create a file)
* stat() - (get file status)
* unlink() - (delete a name and possibly the file it refers to)
* fsync() - (synchronize a file's in-core state with storage device)
* close() - (close a file descriptor)
* utime() - (change file last access and modification times)
Using these system calls, the main analysis options for metarates are the following:
* Measure the rate of file creates/closes (create/close per second)
* Measure the rate of utime calls (utimes per second)
* Measure the rate of stat calls (stats per second)
----------------------------------------
筆者の Jeffrey B. Laytonさんは、今まで LLNLで開発された fdtreeという
Metadata Benchmarkを使用してきてました (fdtreeは IORと同じ部門が開発
した有名な Benchmarkです)
Scalable I/O Benchmark Downloads
https://computing.llnl.gov/?set=code&page=sio_downloads
例えば:
"Metadata Performance of Four Linux File Systems"
September 2nd, 2009
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7497/1.html
"Improving MetaData Performance of the Ext4 Journaling Device"
December 28th, 2009
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7642/1.html
"Size Can Matter: Improving Metadata Performance with Ext4 Journal Sizing - Part I"
January 12th, 2010
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7666/1.html
"Size Can Matter: Ramdisk Journal Metadata Performance - Part 2"
January 19th, 2010
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7675/1.html
"Size Can Matter: Would You Prefer the Hard Drive or the Ramdisk this Evening? Part 3"
January 26th, 2010
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7682/1.html
"Size Can Matter: Throughput Performance with a Disk-Based Journal - Part 4"
February 3rd, 2010
http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7691/1.html
冒頭で紹介した記事の最後は
Comparison between fdtree and metarates
"Let's compare the general trends we obtained from running metarates
with running fdtree by looking at some highlights from both."
Summary
"One of the intents of this article is to examine metadata performance
using the metarates benchmark with a combination of journal size and
devices as well as a function of the number of processes. But perhaps
more importantly, an intent is to examine the trends of metadata
performance when a different benchmark is used."
※この後も続きます
Jeffrey B. Laytonさんの記事一覧:
What's in Stor(ag)e
http://www.linux-mag.com/blogs/jlayton
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿